|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dierdra Vaal
|
Posted - 2009.05.30 22:09:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Dierdra Vaal on 30/05/2009 22:11:09 The first issues meeting of CSM3 on June 7th at 17:00.
Issues to be announced. Director of Education :: EVE University
|
Dierdra Vaal
|
Posted - 2009.05.31 11:38:00 -
[2]
submitting the following items:
Neutral alt repping: http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1076556 Eve Online font (defaulted due to the amount of support): http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1019753 Director of Education :: EVE University
|
Dierdra Vaal
|
Posted - 2009.05.31 17:47:00 -
[3]
Added the topic. atm I left off the eve font issue since that was voted through last april: http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1042783
I'll add it if you really want it but I dont think its required to bring it up again 1 month after it was succesfully voted through. Director of Education :: EVE University
|
Dierdra Vaal
|
Posted - 2009.06.03 18:29:00 -
[4]
Originally by: mazzilliu So, I just realized I have a conflict with this meeting date... I have family coming over this weekend, so probably 99% chance I won't make this meeting. Alts you better be sure to log on, and can you please not raise the issues I brought up in this thread if I don't come? I'll bring them up instead next meeting.
so, consider that your official notification that i won't be here. dunno if i'm supposed to send that warning to some GM's email or what as well.
updated and removed your issues :) Director of Education :: EVE University
|
Dierdra Vaal
|
Posted - 2009.06.11 08:36:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Dierdra Vaal on 11/06/2009 08:37:01 to everyone who is unhappy with the FW issue voting results - sorry but Eve is more than FW. Sure its not perfect, but other areas have just as many - if not more - problems. So ya, we didnt agree with a blanket 'higher development priority' for FW. Dont accuse us of only looking out for ourselves while demanding a higher development commitment to the small part of Eve you happen to play.
And while I personally wouldnt have minded asking CCP about the FW lag, it is likely that there wouldnt be much news on it. Reserve your judgement for the end of the CSM term. |
Dierdra Vaal
|
Posted - 2009.06.11 14:13:00 -
[6]
David Caldera: With exclamations of "All 3 FW problems that was mentioned are very serious and must be brought up now" (and similarly demanding language was used in the issues themselves) it does look to me like FW pilots feel their part of the game deserves more attention that others. You might not feel that way, and maybe even the poster didnt intend it that way (in which case he/she should rephrase their request), but to me it reads like someone insisting that their demands are heard now.
The CSM isnt denying that FW needs attention (and in fact the lag issue only narrowly failed - perhaps partially due to a lacking explanation of the specific lag: note that my question during the issue discussion remained unanswered). We just dont agree it deserves a higher development priority at this point. CCP is working on it, just as they are working on other parts of the game. I actually talked to Erik after one of his issues was denied - I believe its a lot more likely to pass a specific issue than to simply ask for a higher priority for ALL of the FW development. In much the same vein I wouldnt support someone asking for a higher priority of 0.0 gameplay development.
Sure FW has its defects, but I have yet to meet a 0.0 pilot who feels the current sovereignity system is a good one (a system which has been in place for years, btw), and I'm hearing a lot of industry (esp. mining) pilots lament that their gameplay is in serious need of improvements. So why would FW deserve a higher development priority than 0.0, or industry, or any of the other many gameplay aspects?
Morphisat: CSM members can choose which topics to put on the agenda. If Vuk wants to discuss hull repping drones he can do so. If it makes you feel any better, the issue only took 2 minutes or so to discuss, so very little time was 'wasted'. And if you worry about CCP spending precious development time on it, these issues have NOT yet been prioritized by the CSM, and CCP will adjust the priorities themselves as well.
Raimo: 15K players seems like a lot (5% of the player base), but its eclipsed by the amount of players involved in 0.0, which in turn is eclipsed by the huge amount of players who stick to high sec. Hence why I said 'small part of eve'.
Furthermore I'd like to remind everyone there are still plenty of meetings ahead. So unbunch your panties and take a deep breath, FW issues still have plenty of oppurtunity to be brought up :)
Director of Education :: EVE University
|
Dierdra Vaal
|
Posted - 2009.06.11 17:23:00 -
[7]
Well I admit I wasnt aware there were so many problems with FW (I only plex occasionally on my minmatar FW alt), so I'll see if we can do anything more to improve FW. :)
Mind you, I still stand by my votes from meeting #02 on the issues as they were presented there. |
|
|
|